Although the long form was administered to these samples, in the present study we examined only the subset of 25 items, which constitute the short form because our purpose was to compare the performance of a item version to the existing item short form of the SPSI-R. Practical and relevant self-report measures of patient health behaviors for primary care research. To assess stability in the absolute level of item difficulties, we examined the displacement of item locations from the initial validation sample to the cross-validation samples. Initial eigenvalues provided information from the initial solution with all possible factors, while the extraction sums of squared loadings were used to determine the final retained factors. Social problem-solving training is commonly used in remedial programs in the school context and in the treatment of a wide variety of psychiatric disorders.
To verify that the original items of the SPSI-R short form could be combined into a global, unidimensional measure of problem solving, the items were fit to the Rasch model for rating scales in the sample of low-vision patients. Their contact information is as follows: Table 1 displays estimates and fit statistics, and also descriptive statistics for the raw score total of the 10 items.
Dreer, University of Alabama at Birmingham. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. As part of separate, ongoing studies, the SPSI-R long-form version was sovling to both the caregiver sample and the diabetes sample. Specifically, we used the Probleem rating scale model Andrich, to assess the measurement structure of the full item scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Social problem-solving inventory–revised (SPSI-R) (Book, ) 
Write a review Rate this item: As in the initial validation sample, the reduced version of the scale showed no great loss of predictive power in any of the analyses. Item separation reliabilities were.
Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Eighty-two family caregivers were unemployed, 39 were employed part-time, and 10 were employed fulltime.
Comparison of two self-report instruments for assessing binge eating in proglem surgery candidates. However, regarding the cultural rele- vance of the test items, the experts invenfory that it might not be most appropriate to put Item 10 and Item 42 in the AS subscale. Although the item has a relatively low factor loading of. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: All items fit the model successfully, with fit statistics ranging from.
Regarding the intercorrelation among the subscales of the full form of the C-SPSI-R, the results showed that the subscales were significantly correlated among themselves. Research on social work practice in Chinese communities [Special issue].
A factor-analytic study of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory: An integration of theory and data
Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. The age of the partici- pants ranged from 11 to 15 years, with a mean of Sfor adults with moderate and severe TBI.
The Rasch residual PCA was used to assess if inbentory were meaningful structures of residuals after extracting the primary Rasch dimension. This would aid identification of those patient subgroups best suited for assessment of social problem solving. Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. As this factor silving assessed negative problem-solving style related to avoidance, it was labeled Avoidance Style.
Qualified caregivers were then scheduled for an appointment by a trained research staff member and asked to participate in the study.
The correlation between measures on the item and item versions was. Patricia Rivera, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, — Research in pdoblem therapy. The final component is the behavioral style of problem solving, which is whether one tends to approach or avoid problem solving and whether one is impulsive or careful in problem solving. Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment.
However, the remaining two factors, negative problem solving orientation and skills, and negative problems solving emotion, could only distinguish people into two different functional levels.