LEARNHIGHER ORAL COMMUNICATION LITERATURE REVIEW

Learning at university Working with others Research skills Writing at university Employability. Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular resources: About us LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector. As far as indicator 2 is concerned, the ability to motivate, students in chemistry highly appreciate it 3. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Smith make the key observation that, in higher education, both teachers and students must develop oral communication competence. Retrieved from World Wide Web 9 mai http:

The research targeted students in their third academic year, studying at 5 technical faculties Computer Science, Electronics and Telecommunications, Electrical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanics. Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular resources: Quallities of effective teachers. American International Journal of Contemporary. About us LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector.

Learnhigher | Learning Development Research

Comunicarea educationala in context scolar. Students’ opinions regarding the “beginning” of oral presentation Figure 2 illustrates that students appreciate more the teacher’s ability to draw attention indicator 1, mean 3.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

Retrieved from World Wide Web 9 mai American International Journal of Contemporary Research. Indicator 3 ranks first mean 4. LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector. The current research aims at identifying the extent to which academic engineering teaching staff’s communication competences are highly appreciated by their students.

  GREATER GRASSMARKET BID BUSINESS PLAN

learnhigher oral communication literature review

In the case of the highly valued indicators, Mechanics 3. Learning Development Research Literature reviews Useful websites Other materials Research reciew and project reports Books and journals.

Learning Development Research

Method and instruments The engineering teachers’ oral communication competence was broken down into 12 indicators according to the structure of any lecture: Why Educational Technology has Failed.

In order to develop the students’ communicative competence, teachers must be the first to prove it and practice it through interaction with the students, setting themselves as an example.

The purpose is to identify the engineering teaching staff’s strengths and weaknesses that must be improved, through oral communication activities, typical of higher education, such as lectures. The target group consisted of engineering students at “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, as shown in Figure 1: The results have helped identify both the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering teachers: A Publication of The Harriet W.

A questionnaire was devised according to the structural elements of an oral presentation: Teaching and Persuasive Communication: Read more about our history.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

By oral communication, lectures provide students with valuable information and fosters cognitive, creative, communicative, sensitive, moral abilities etc, in short, an overall perspective on life and world” Vintanu, p. A useful framework for understanding communication competence was lfarnhigher by Spitzbergp.

Retrieved from World Wide Web 9 mai http: The purpose of the study is to identify the weaknesses and strengths to be improved and worked on by the engineering teaching staff when compelled to deliver oral presentations, since communicative competence is a prerequisite both for the didactic process and research dissemination.

  M101J HOMEWORK 3 ANSWERS

Conclusions and recommendations The results have helped identify both the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering teachers: Learning at university Working with others Research skills Writing lietrature university Employability. The ability to learnhighdr attention is highly appreciated by engineering students studying Electrical Engineering and Chemistry 3.

As far as indicator 2 is concerned, the ability to motivate, students in chemistry highly appreciate it 3. Indicator 1 – Clear structure; Indicator 2 – Accessible presentation, easy to understand; Indicator 3 – Self-management and confidence; Indicator 4- Accurate and appropriate speaking, Indicator 5 – Appropriate posture; Indicator 6 – Modern visual aids efficiently used.

American International Journal of Contemporary. Perception of Student Teachers about Teaching Competencies.

1 LearnHigher Oral Communication Literature Review Free pdf download – –

Research findings and outcomes The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: It deems fit to offer some suggestions regarding the main three phases of an oral presentation: Adding your resources is a great way to amplify their reach across the UK and beyond! Do you have learning communicatio teaching resources to share?

Published by Elsevier Ltd.