Each movement, he told me, has its centre of gravity; it is enough to control this within the puppet. As he picked it up he said, half in anger and half in jest, that he had met his master but that there is a master for everyone and everything – and now he proposed to lead me to mine. At this moment her soul appears to be in the small of her back. This judgement, that above all criticized the Berlin style of August Wilhelm Iffland, was symptomatic of the theatrical situation of the time. I said the operator’s part in the business had been represented to me as something which can be done entirely without feeling – rather like turning the handle of a barrel-organ. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, Because the operator controls with his wire or thread only this centre, the attached limbs are just what they should be.

The Ambiguity of Art and the Necessity of Form. He countered this by saying that, where grace is concerned, it is impossible for man to come anywhere near a puppet. Or take that young fellow who dances Paris when he’s standing among the three goddesses and offering the apple to Venus. I attacked again, this time with all the skill I could muster. According to Kleist there is no way back.

His attractions slipped away from him, one after the other. In the essay, Kleist has one of the interlocutors comment that marionettenheater possess a grace humans do not. This made me laugh.


Heinrich von Kleist | World Encyclopedia of Puppetry Arts

You’ll look for it in vain in most of our dancers. We know that we have no choice but to be knowing creatures, knowing in both body and mind.

kleist essay über das marionettentheater

His answer was that I must not imagine each limb as being individually positioned and moved by the operator in the various phases of the dance. No human fencer could equal his perception in this respect. In other words, the puppeteer dances.

Kleists »Über das Marionettentheater«

The bear did not move. I know I would certainly have thrust my way through to a human breast, but the bear made a slight movement with his paw and parried my thrust. He began koeist spend whole days before the mirror. A year later Kleist shot himself.

It is a wonderful essay, lightly handled, held in the conversational mode, unsystematic and thought-provoking. This I couldn’t deny.

It is happening all the time. I could see that he had more to say, so I begged him to go on. Because the operator controls with his wire or thread only this centre, the attached limbs are just what they should be.

The craftsman who could make such remarkable limbs could surely build a complete marionette for him, to his specifications. On the Marionette Theatre. First of all a negative one, my friend: I don’t know if it was to test the quality of his apparent grace or to provide a salutary counter to his vanity When the centre of gravity is moved in a straight line, the limbs übwr curves.


Marionettenfheater again will they indwell in their own material bodiliness as they did before the Fall. The self-consciousness gets in the way. Maison de Heidelberg, I inquired about the mechanism of these figures.

Grace and Affectation

I accepted his challenge but, as it turned out, I had the better of him. They know that they are naked and feel that they must cover themselves. In the turmoil of the Napoleonic Marionettenthearer, which uprooted every life, he became a sceptic who now defined grace differently: The Major Works of Heinrich von Kleist.

kleist essay über das marionettentheater

In they said he’d come into the world on 18 October two hundred years too early What am I saying Even in the latter case the line is only elliptical, a form of movement natural to the human body because of the joints, so this hardly demands any great skill from the operator. Why shouldn’t I believe it from you? Kleist was part of the Romantic tradition. I wanted to know how it is possible, without having a maze of strings attached to one’s fingers, to marionettenhheater the separate limbs and extremities in the rhythm of the dance.